Pasquinade ([info]pats_quinade) wrote,
@ 2008-07-08 18:23:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:review

Review: Wanted
I got to see Wanted recently, bringing my total of movies watched on a big screen in 2008 up to a shocking two. Mick LaSalle, the San Francisco Chronicle reviewer I love to disagree with, saw it as a dangerous message to be sending to America's youth, that being a horrible serial killing hyperviolent murderer is better than being a nobody. This was a fantastic message, and I applaud Mick for holding onto it for the nine years since The Matrix came out, in which the agents could take over people's bodies, and it actually was to your advantage to gun down the blue-pills.

Short version: I liked it, and loved the hilariously over-the-top action, but I think that either I was thinking too much in some places, or the movie kept trying to get me to think, and then dropping the ball.


Whenever stuff was blowing up, I was in love. They knew how to do a fun and over-the-top action sequence, and they knew how to do a fun and over-the-top Beta-Male-Becomes-Alpha-Male sequence, but every bit of dialog, every cut of the camera, every part where the director got to, I don't know, do stuff, was rife with indications that the guys making the movie thought that we were idiots.

Director: So, okay, we're almost done with this scene.
Producer: What's the scene?
Director: The hero is coming back home to his cheating ex-girlfriend and asshole friend. He punches the friend, ignores the harping cheating ex-girlfriend as he goes to get the gun he left in the apartment, and comes back out to tongue-kiss Angelina Jolie in slow motion while the harping ex-girlfriend stammers incoherently. Then the hero leaves the room without ever talking to her.
Producer: Hm. It needs more.
Director: I know. How are we supposed to tell the audience that he's become a badass cool Alpha Male if the only clue we're giving is that he's ignoring the ex-girlfriend, punching the asshole ex-friend, and tongue-kissing Angelina Jolie in slow motion?
Producer: Okay, what if, what if, what if after he leaves, the asshole friend lying on the ground, with his nose and mouth bloody, says, "Oh, yeah, he's the man."
Director: To who?
Producer: Um. To the audience, I guess.
Director: Love it.

Director: Got another tough scene coming up.
Producer: Hit me.
Director: The hero is returning to the lair of the assassins who live in the top of the textile factory.
Producer: Why is it a textile factory?
Director: Uh, the writer wanted it. Something about how they're the Weavers, and they look at errors in these giant looms, which apparently give errors that form a binary code that actually translates to English ASCII code of the names of targets.
Producer: Okay. Love it.
Director: But the hero, he got trained by them, but now he knows that the leader is evil, right? He's coming back to kill the leader, because the leader is making up targets instead of listening to the loom.
Producer: Right, right.
Director: And he comes in, and Morgan Freeman looks down at him. He's the assassin leader guy.
Producer: Was he trying to cure Alzheimers?
Director: No, you're thinking of Deep Blue Sea.
Producer: Isn't that a movie about the chess thing?
Director: Maybe. Anyway, I've got Freeman looking down at the hero as he enters the courtyard. I need to make it clear that Freeman is an evil manipulative guy.
Producer: Who's all weaving the threads of fate and stuff?
Director: Bingo.
Producer: Cat's cradle.
Director: He's playing cat's cradle with thread while looking down at the hero? Like he's the weaver now, instead of the weaven?
Producer: Right, right.
Director: What if the audience doesn't get it? I mean, they might think he just has a nervous twitch or something.
Producer: Okay, you do one shot of him doing that, looking down at the hero. Then cut to the hero. Then cut back to Freeman, but this time, get this? The camera? It's just on his hands. So it's several seconds of you looking right at him playing cat's cradle.
Director: Oh, yeah. Watching somebody play cat's cradle for several seconds is just what the audience signed on for. Plus, at the end, there's a bit of the hero walking through the tangled wreckage of the place after he blows it up using hordes of rats covered in plastic explosives--
Producer: Gold. That stuff is pure gold.
Director: --and I was worried that people might not understand that by having him stumble through all these tangled and knotted up threads, we were symbolically showing that he had screwed up all the careful weavings that had been going on all these years.
Producer: But a five solid seconds of watching a grown man play with twine?
Director: Oh, yeah, that does it for me.

To be clear, though: any time something was blowing up, I very much liked the movie. I just wished they'd focused on that instead of trying to do character or plot.



(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]kameron_hurley
2008-07-09 10:00 am UTC (link)
It's not a movie that should encourage Deep Thought. There's not really an original thought in the whole movie.

But oh boy was it fun!

(Reply to this)


[info]houseinrlyeh
2008-07-09 10:24 am UTC (link)
Sounds actually like the tone of Millar's comic source. That man doesn't trust his readers to get anything slightly subtle either, nor does he care about the fact nobody is coming to his stuff for depth.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]pats_quinade
2008-07-11 03:14 pm UTC (link)
I think that's why I had such a pained reaction to "Civil War". It was just so ham-handed, and the time it spent on clunky symbolism is time that could have been spent flipping more buses.

Interesting to research the comic after the fact and see that Angelina Jolie was playing the role of a woman who was originally black. (Well, bronze.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]houseinrlyeh
2008-07-11 03:23 pm UTC (link)
I think Millar either doesn't know his strengths or takes his audience for very stupid. I fear it's the latter.

Interesting to research the comic after the fact and see that Angelina Jolie was playing the role of a woman who was originally black. (Well, bronze.)
Now, we can't have a black woman kissing a white man in a Hollwood blockbuster, can we? What would be next? Black people kissing white people in public? *gasps*
In better news, this way we at least didn't have to watch Halle Berry trying to play tough again.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]viking_cat
2008-07-09 01:31 pm UTC (link)
I loved the movie as well, but the things that bothered you are different than the things that bothered me. Lack of sublety is fine for me. But easily resolved plot holes? those are just shameful!

(Huge spoilers probably follow. You've been warned!)

Wanted suffers from what my wife calls the "muffin basket" problem, when a major pivotal plot point could have been resolved ten minutes into the movie if two people would just do the normal thing and talk to one another. The label comes from Star Wars, where Darth Vader doesn't tell Luke he's his father until AFTER he cuts off his hand. If he had, say, sent Luke a muffin basket early on with a polite note... "Dear Luke, You're not aware of it, but I'm actually your father. We're on different sides right now, but I love you very much and hope that you'll consider working for the Emperor and getting to know me better. In the mean time, enjoy a tasty muffin. xxoo, Dad (Lord Vader)"

...then maybe Luke would have caved. He's sure as hell not going to cave after his hand got lopped off.

Wanted is this x10. His Dad (who clearly loved him, or so we're told and shown) keeps firing bullets at him without ever telling Wesley that he's his Dad. If he had sent a muffin basket months ago, or hell, even halfway through the movie, we never would have had this problem.

I had other issues (the ratbomb logistics, for instance, or why Wesley wakes up back in the states after his accident in Europe) but it was still stupid-crazy-fun. I even liked it better than the comic book.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]pats_quinade
2008-07-11 03:18 pm UTC (link)
re: ratbombs: How could you have issues with those? We had a chart that explained just how they worked! It even had red-marker illustrations for the explosions. (cough)

And yes, the idea of the father stalking the son and never, you know, mentioning this to him at any point... is dumb. More immediately problematic was that as soon as we got the big "Cross is Frodo's Father" moment (um, I always thought of the hero as being Frodo for some reason, just because he had that hangdog look), my first and immediate thought was "In the first gunfight in the drugstore, I saw Frodo dive to the ground, and a bullet punched out of the shelf exactly where Frodo's head had been. At the time, the clear implication was that Cross was shooting at Frodo, and was so cool that he could shoot at him through cover. Now, Cross is just a lousy shot who almost killed the son he was supposedly trying to save."

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]viking_cat
2008-07-11 03:24 pm UTC (link)
Picture, if you will, how much time it must have taken to wire timers and plastic explosives to several thousand slimy, peanut butter coated rats. With all the timers set ahead of time to the exact same countdown, which wasn't a time - so he had to continually recalculate how much time would elapse before the rats blew.

Now, explain to me why the rats all went into the factory instead of, say, out into the street or staying in the dump truck. And how they managed to get EVERYWHERE in the factory so quickly. Instead of just sort of hanging out in the courtyard. Or the kitchen.

While you're at it, I'm a little curious why there was a refrigerated meatlocker in a textile factory, and why it was the one place the rats never seemingly got to.

But other than that? WHEEEEEEEE! It was fun!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…